Evidence

for market systems approaches

Visit the evidence map
Published by
Alliances Lesser Caucasus Programme (ALCP)
Project implementer
Mercy Corps
Donor
SDC / ADA / Sida
Programme
Alliances Lesser Caucasus Programme 2 (ALCP2)
Results level
Poverty reduction
Method
Quasi-experimental
Data source
Mixed
Intervention types
Improved input supply
Improved marketing of products
Improved value chain coordination

The Alliances Caucasus Programme 2 (ALCP2) is a four-year programme ending in April 2026 aiming to develop the honey market system in Georgia, focusing on addressing market constraints, enhancing the image of Georgian honey, and promoting sustainability and climate adaptation.

This impact assessment aimed to evaluate the effects of the programme's interventions on Georgian beekeepers. It focused on whether beekeepers gained access to regular, stable, and improved honey sales, and how beekeeping extension services influenced their knowledge, practices, and production

Key interventions include strengthening the Georgian Beekeepers Union (GBU), supporting Jara Bio honey production, facilitating honey processing factories, and providing climate-smart beekeeping inputs.

Intervention description

The programme implemented several interventions to support the beekeeping sector in Georgia. These included forming the Georgian Beekeepers Union (GBU) to unify honey associations and strengthen service provision, supporting Jara Bio honey production through the Jara Beekeepers Association (JBA), and facilitating honey processing and export companies such as Api-Geo.

The interventions focused on providing training in good beekeeping practices, climate change adaptation and disease management. As of 2023, the programme had reached 6,816 beekeepers, with 5,003 attending training and 2,939 experiencing positive income changes due to ALCP2-facilitated services.

Evidence methodology

The impact assessment employed the DCED approved Comparison Groups (CG) attribution strategy, comparing beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups. A survey involving 115 beekeepers (80 beneficiaries and 35 non-beneficiaries) was conducted using online and door-to-door sampling methods. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS, while qualitative data were analysed in Excel.

The study aimed to evaluate access to services, productivity, beekeeping practices, disease management, market access and investment in production among the beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups.

This programme’s results measurement system has passed an audit against the DCED Standard.